DV-2022 Lawsuit Information

Law Office of curtis morrison
Law Office of curtis morrison
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Diversity Visa
    • DV 2022
    • DV 2021
    • DV 2020
  • Family Immigration
    • Wilson v Biden
    • Sunny v Biden
    • Santos v Biden
    • Shaibi v Shaddou
  • Mandamus
    • Mandamus
    • N-400 FAQ
    • 中文网站 (in Mandarin)
  • Press
  • Blog
  • Helpful Videos
  • Contact us
  • More
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Diversity Visa
      • DV 2022
      • DV 2021
      • DV 2020
    • Family Immigration
      • Wilson v Biden
      • Sunny v Biden
      • Santos v Biden
      • Shaibi v Shaddou
    • Mandamus
      • Mandamus
      • N-400 FAQ
      • 中文网站 (in Mandarin)
    • Press
    • Blog
    • Helpful Videos
    • Contact us

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Diversity Visa
  • Family Immigration
  • Mandamus
  • Press
  • Blog
  • Helpful Videos
  • Contact us

Tesfaye v Blinken

Tesfaye Plaintiffs challenge the State Department policy of withholding the adjudication of a visa application from Ethiopian and Sudanese Diversity Visa selectees by preventing them from reassigning their interview locations. 

Case 1:22-cv-00411

Docket Filings


MAY 2, 2022 MINUTE ORDER


APRIL 25, 2022 DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS


MARCH 2, 2022 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE BY WILLIAM H. WEILAND AS GOVERNMENT COUNSEL


MARCH 2, 2022 PROOF OF SERVICE


FEBRUARY 16, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED TO JUDGE COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY


FEBRUARY 15, 2022 COMPLAINT


FEBRUARY 15, 2022 CASE IS FILED 

This site is legal advertising for Morrison Urena, L.C.

  • DV 2022
  • Mandamus
  • Press
  • Blog